Ronit J

Untold: Chess Mates (2026) Synopsis:

Magnus Carlsen, widely regarded as the greatest chess player of all time, is challenged by Hans Niemann, a rising star who capitalizes on the meteoric growth of online chess. Niemann’s ascension culminated in an epic, controversy-shrouded victory over Carlsen at the 2022 Sinquefield Cup, which eventually led to allegations and revelations of cheating. Determined to clear his name, Niemann fights his way back to the top of the chess world, setting the stage for a high-stakes rematch with Carlsen in 2024.

Untold: Chess Mates (2026) Review:

I remember following the 2022 Sinquefield Cup tournament even before the scandal broke out. Like many, I too started following chess in the pandemic, and it’s been a big part of my life ever since. That being said, I think I pretty much consumed everything there was to consume about this scandal, from tweets to YouTube analyses, from the top players to the best content creators. The long story short is that I knew the whole situation in-and-out. There wasn’t much that the documentary could have told me, especially given it’s a Netflix documentary.

TL;DR: I was right.

A Netflix Documentary

Netflix documentaries are highly entertaining. I’ve seen a bunch of them, particularly the true crime ones that my wife and I used to binge on long time ago. However, as someone who’s also watched the likes of Ram Ke Naam (1992) and The Act of Killing (2012), Netflix documentaries also felt substandard to me. They trade in journalistic integrity for shock and engagement. They are, after all, the streaming platform’s equivalent of prime time news segments. All flash, sometimes substance, but mostly just to keep you subscribed.

Untold: Chess Mates is the first Netflix documentary I watched where I knew everything about the issue before I watched the film. That unique position made this both a special watch, and an immensely disappointing one. The more I reflect upon this documentary, the more I realise that the only people it really features are the parties involved, and Hikaru Nakamura. No other Piece-to-Camera. No on-ground coverage or an attempt to understand the people they’re documenting. Just people telling the story, and… that’s it.

The more I think about it, the more I realise that this documentary was not for me. It’s mostly for people who were interested in knowing about the controversy, and passively consuming said content while being lost on their phones or eating food.

No one comes out looking good

Honestly, the whole controversy did nothing for me when it happened. The only outcome was me losing a little bit of respect for Magnus Carlsen. I only discovered Hans Moke Niemann because of the controversy, and I have gone on to enjoy many of his games since. As for chess.com, I actively play on the platform, while also being aware that they’re slowly but surely becoming victims of enshittification. However, I will say this: the documentary made me feel very much like abandoning chess.com. Danny Rensch & Erik Allebest came off as these know-it-all tech bros who care only about their product and nothing more. But then again, no one really appears great in this one.

A documentary can be of various kinds. There are those that make you think, those that shed light on events, and those that entertain you. Untold: Chess Mates was clearly the latter. In catering to our Schadenfreude, it basically belittles everyone involved through the opinions of the very people involved. It’s an okay watch if you don’t care about the game, but if you do, I’d recommend steering clear. Because it doesn’t do anything to talk about the game. It does very brief human stories on the two opposing powerhouses, Magnus & Hans, with some attention given to chess.com. But that’s it.

In the end, as the credits rolled, I thought to myself why I even bothered watching this. Not the worst thing I’ve watched this year, but certainly on the bottom end of the list.

Untold: Chess Mates (2026) Ending Explained (SPOILERS)

The documentary spends more than half its runtime building to the moment of the cheating scandal. Then, it briefly explores both sides without really saying anything substantial. In the end, the documentary mentions the lawsuit that Hans filed against Magnus and chess.com, and that they settled. The documentary ends with Niemann losing his rematch with Magnus in 2024, with Carlsen repeating Hans’ statement of ‘The chess speaks for itself.’

None of the parties involved come out looking better than they were before.

Is Untold: Chess Mates (2026) worth watching?

If you know about the issue only cursorily, then maybe. If you are like me and know everything there is to know about the documentary, this one is going to be a waste of time.

Honestly, just read the wikipedia page, and you’ll know exactly as much as the documentary puts out.

In Conclusion:

Untold: Chess Mates (2026) is a Netflix documentary (derogatory). The Wikipedia page about the controversy is a much more enticing experience.

Also check out:

• Shrinking Season 3 | TV Review
• Jury Duty Presents: Company Retreat | TV Review
• Island of the Dying Goddess

What did you think of Untold: Chess Mates (2026)? Let me know in the comments below.

Sign up to my newsletter & get a free copy of Abandoned by the Gods. Is there any movie, show, or book you’d like me to review? Drop your recommendations in the comments below.

Until next time!